Start with one project and one measurable problem.
A controlled scope validates technical fit, business value and adoption before anyone has to defend a platform decision.
Schedule & project intelligence.
Schedule & Project Intelligence
Connect IFC/BIM, baseline schedule, daily reports, inspections and evidence records.
Value, not features
Risk lead time, evidence retrieval speed, reporting effort and decision-cycle reduction.
Evidence-backed actions
Actual vs planned, delay cause, forecast range, mitigation scenarios and approvals.
Twelve weeks, four checkpoints.
Nothing here depends on a data migration finishing first. If week five does not produce something the team uses, we say so.
- Weeks 1–2
Scope and success test
Agree the project, the decision we are trying to improve and the metrics that will decide whether it worked. Written down before anything is built.
- Weeks 3–5
Connect the data
Ingest IFC/BIM, the baseline schedule, daily reports and evidence records. Reconcile claimed against evidenced progress and surface the gap.
- Weeks 6–9
Intelligence in the loop
Risk drivers, forecast ranges and Ask Twin running against live project context, used by the real team in their real weekly cycle.
- Weeks 10–12
Measure and decide
Report against the success test — honestly — and make a go/no-go call with the evidence to support either answer.
Less than you would expect.
A pilot that requires a year of data cleansing before it produces anything is not a pilot.
IFC · Baseline Schedule · Daily Reports · RFI/NCR · Inspections · Photos
Actual vs Planned · Delay Cause · Risk · Forecast · Evidence · Mitigation